<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RT @mecredis RANT RANT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2009/06/10/rt-mecredis-rant-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2009/06/10/rt-mecredis-rant-rant/</link>
	<description>data, copyright, photography, not necessarily in that order</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2009/06/10/rt-mecredis-rant-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-14189</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=565#comment-14189</guid>
		<description>Nice, I think that&#039;s a really good compromise and probably preserves what they were trying to do in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, I think that&#8217;s a really good compromise and probably preserves what they were trying to do in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2009/06/10/rt-mecredis-rant-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-14188</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=565#comment-14188</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with you.  There is a difference between the two -- I think the RT syntax is useful because it credits the caption author by prefixing the post with the original authors username.  I personally use &quot;via&quot; in cases when I want to credit a link, but will provide my own caption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with you.  There is a difference between the two &#8212; I think the RT syntax is useful because it credits the caption author by prefixing the post with the original authors username.  I personally use &#8220;via&#8221; in cases when I want to credit a link, but will provide my own caption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  fredbenenson.com/blog/2009/06/10/rt-mecredis-rant-rant/feed/ ) in 0.21464 seconds, on May 17th, 2012 at 12:30 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 17th, 2012 at 1:30 pm UTC -->
