Comments on: The WSJ Showing Its Cards http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/ Because I don't like character limits. Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:17:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Fred http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6998 Fred Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:39:58 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6998 MK, fixed, Thanks! MK, fixed, Thanks!

]]> By: MK http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6972 MK Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:10:41 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6972 That's a good summary. Just a note: it's *Gandhi*, not "Ghandi". (Also, the previous comment appears to be spam.) That’s a good summary. Just a note: it’s *Gandhi*, not “Ghandi”. (Also, the previous comment appears to be spam.)

]]> By: Fred Benenson’s Blog » Blog Archive » The WSJ Gets it Wrong Again and/or The RIAA Lies Once Again http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6525 Fred Benenson’s Blog » Blog Archive » The WSJ Gets it Wrong Again and/or The RIAA Lies Once Again Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:34:31 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6525 [...] a case of not thinking critically enough about sources and evidence based reporting. Either way, if the network neutrality article didn’t give you enough reason to distrust the WSJ’s te..., this incident should. This also leads me to believe that the WSJ has under-critical technology [...] [...] a case of not thinking critically enough about sources and evidence based reporting. Either way, if the network neutrality article didn’t give you enough reason to distrust the WSJ’s te…, this incident should. This also leads me to believe that the WSJ has under-critical technology [...]

]]> By: Patrick Thornton http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6391 Patrick Thornton Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:51:44 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6391 Don't forget that edge caching saves the whole Internet bandwidth by caching files locally at the ISP level. This will become more and more important as more high bandwidth content like video is transmitted over the tubes. It's good for everyone when Google and other large content providers like Akamai, Bright Cove, etc utilize edge caching. Yes, it benefits those companies and their customers, but it also benefits those of us who do not use their products. Instead of large amount of data be transmitted from data centers around the world, much of that data can be cached much closer to individual users. Don’t forget that edge caching saves the whole Internet bandwidth by caching files locally at the ISP level.

This will become more and more important as more high bandwidth content like video is transmitted over the tubes. It’s good for everyone when Google and other large content providers like Akamai, Bright Cove, etc utilize edge caching. Yes, it benefits those companies and their customers, but it also benefits those of us who do not use their products. Instead of large amount of data be transmitted from data centers around the world, much of that data can be cached much closer to individual users.

]]> By: Veni Markovski http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6381 Veni Markovski Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:59:10 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6381 But what edge caching does, is that practically, companies that can afford it, will still benefit from different restrictions which may or may not be implemented at the ISP level. In other words - I understand the point about how good it is, but at the same time, people must be aware that whoever has more money, will ensure that their information gets faster ;) But what edge caching does, is that practically, companies that can afford it, will still benefit from different restrictions which may or may not be implemented at the ISP level.
In other words – I understand the point about how good it is, but at the same time, people must be aware that whoever has more money, will ensure that their information gets faster ;)

]]> By: Fred http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6356 Fred Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:21:09 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6356 Good point. I've amended the above post to reflect this. Good point. I’ve amended the above post to reflect this.

]]> By: Bjorn Stromberg http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/12/16/the-wsj-showing-its-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-6355 Bjorn Stromberg Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:17:45 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=372#comment-6355 "Edge caching does not violate network neutrality in the same way the telecommunications companies are interested in violating network neutrality." Be careful how you say things. This sentence seems to say that edge caching does violate network neutrality, just not in the same way. Are you trying to say that edge caching violates network neutrality? “Edge caching does not violate network neutrality in the same way the telecommunications companies are interested in violating network neutrality.”

Be careful how you say things. This sentence seems to say that edge caching does violate network neutrality, just not in the same way. Are you trying to say that edge caching violates network neutrality?

]]>