http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/11/21/google-street-views-revealing-error/ data, copyright, photography, not necessarily in that order Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:13:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/11/21/google-street-views-revealing-error/comment-page-1/#comment-20792 Fred Benenson’s Blog » Blog Archive » Google Now Selling Virtual Ads on Real Real Estate Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:20:11 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=343#comment-20792 [...] year I posted on Google modifying representations of reality (Streetview) and hypothesized about the potent.... Now we have a potential real world test case as Google might be selling advertisements inside [...] [...] year I posted on Google modifying representations of reality (Streetview) and hypothesized about the potent…. Now we have a potential real world test case as Google might be selling advertisements inside [...]

]]> http://fredbenenson.com/blog/2008/11/21/google-street-views-revealing-error/comment-page-1/#comment-14820 Kiernan Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:54:42 +0000 http://fredbenenson.com/blog/?p=343#comment-14820 I think if the ads aren't paid for to google, then the ads shouldn't have to be shown in streetview. Blurring everything is a way to protect identity. But as advertisers lose more money to the Internet, they won't have the money to devote to lawyers to fight cases for them which are obviously bureaucratic losses for somebody (tax payer?). We shouldn't have our courts clogged with redundant advertising conglomerates that haven't realized their butt is toast and direct advertising is the way of the future. Google likewise should replace the posters with their own advertisers. That should really piss off the advertisers, and it would be legal, as the advertisers would have a hard time determining when the advertisements were there.. Especially if google blurred out the clocks and other timepieces. I think if the ads aren’t paid for to google, then the ads shouldn’t have to be shown in streetview. Blurring everything is a way to protect identity. But as advertisers lose more money to the Internet, they won’t have the money to devote to lawyers to fight cases for them which are obviously bureaucratic losses for somebody (tax payer?). We shouldn’t have our courts clogged with redundant advertising conglomerates that haven’t realized their butt is toast and direct advertising is the way of the future. Google likewise should replace the posters with their own advertisers. That should really piss off the advertisers, and it would be legal, as the advertisers would have a hard time determining when the advertisements were there.. Especially if google blurred out the clocks and other timepieces.

]]>