Google Street View's Revealing Error

Google Streetmap Blurs Faces in Advertisements, Too.

After receiving criticism for the privacy-violating "feature" of Google Street View that enabled anyone to easily identify people who happened to be on the street as Google's car drove by, the search giant started blurring faces.

What is interesting, and what Mako would consider a "Revealing Error", is when the auto-blur algorithm can not distinguish between an advertisement's face and a regular human's face. For the ad, the model has been compensated to have his likeness (and privacy) commercially exploited for the brand being advertised. On the other hand, there is a legal grey-area as to whether Google can do the same for random people on the street, and rather than face more privacy criticism, Google chooses to blur their identities to avoid raising the issue of whether it is their right to do so, at least in America.

So who cares that the advertisement has been modified? The advertiser, probably. If a 2002 case was any indication, advertisers do not like it when their carefully placed and expensive Manhattan advertisements get digitally altered. While the advertisers lost a case against Sony for changing (and charging for) advertisements in the background of Spiderman scenes located in Times Square, its clear that they were expecting their ads to actually show up in whatever work happened to be created in that space. There are interesting copyright implications here, too, as it demonstrates an implicit desire by big media for work like advertising to be reappropriated and recontextualized because it serves the point of getting a name "out there."

To put my undergraduate philosophy degree to use, I believe these cases bring up deep ethical and ontological questions about the right to control and exhibit realities (Google Street View being one reality, Spiderman's Time Square being another) as they obtain to the real reality. Is it just the difference between a fiction and a non-fiction reality? I don't think so, as no one uses Google maps expecting to retrieve information that is fictional. Regardless, expect these kinds of issues to come up more and more frequently as Google increases its resolution and virtual worlds merge closer to real worlds.

3 comments

  1. Kiernan

    I think if the ads aren't paid for to google, then the ads shouldn't have to be shown in streetview. Blurring everything is a way to protect identity. But as advertisers lose more money to the Internet, they won't have the money to devote to lawyers to fight cases for them which are obviously bureaucratic losses for somebody (tax payer?). We shouldn't have our courts clogged with redundant advertising conglomerates that haven't realized their butt is toast and direct advertising is the way of the future. Google likewise should replace the posters with their own advertisers. That should really piss off the advertisers, and it would be legal, as the advertisers would have a hard time determining when the advertisements were there.. Especially if google blurred out the clocks and other timepieces.

  2. Pingback: Fred Benenson’s Blog » Blog Archive » Google Now Selling Virtual Ads on Real Real Estate
  3. Pingback: Faces of Google Street View | Revealing Errors

Post a comment

You may use the following HTML:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>